California · federal district court

AI-hallucinated citation decisions: District Court, C.D. California

4 decisions and docket orders from this court, 2025 to 2026, in which the court addressed authority that did not exist. 3 carry a page with the court's words quoted; the rest link straight to the source.

Retrieved from CourtListener public records.

C.D. Cal. · 4 records
DateCaseStateThe text mentionsSource
Tekoma Chaney v. Transdev Services Inc. No. 2:24-cv-10761Californiaa referral to a bar or disciplinary body, a certification about AI use, dismissal, sanctionsCourtListener
Estate of Khallid Muhammad v. Tupac Shakur Estate No. 2:25-cv-02540Californiasanctions, an order to show causeCourtListener
Angelica E. Cruz v. United States No. 2:24-cv-01087Californiasanctions, an order to show causeCourtListener
Christopher Kluwe v. Huntington Beach Union High No. 8:25-cv-01648Californiaa warning or admonition, dismissal, attorney's fees or costs, Rule 11CourtListener

More from California, or the whole record of court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations. For the rule this court applies to a filing with AI in it, see the court AI orders tracker.

Show me on one of my files →

Every decision here is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on my files