Connecticut · federal district court

AI-hallucinated citation decisions: District Court, D. Connecticut

3 decisions and docket orders from this court, 2025 to 2026, in which the court addressed authority that did not exist. 3 carry a page with the court's words quoted; the rest link straight to the source.

Retrieved from CourtListener public records.

D. Conn. · 3 records
DateCaseStateThe text mentionsSource
In re: Booker No. 3:25-cv-01205ConnecticutChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, Perplexity, a warning or admonitionCourtListener
Andre v. Warden No. 3:24-cv-01295Connecticuta warning or admonition, a certification about AI use, dismissal, a self-represented partyCourtListener
Cojom v. Roblen No. 3:23-cv-01669ConnecticutChatGPT, Harvey, continuing legal education, a self-represented partyCourtListener

More from Connecticut, or the whole record of court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations. For the rule this court applies to a filing with AI in it, see the court AI orders tracker.

Show me on one of my files →

Every decision here is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on my files