Washington · federal district court

AI-hallucinated citation decisions: District Court, W.D. Washington

5 decisions and docket orders from this court, 2025 to 2026, in which the court addressed authority that did not exist. 5 carry a page with the court's words quoted; the rest link straight to the source.

Retrieved from CourtListener public records.

W.D. Wash. · 5 records
DateCaseStateThe text mentionsSource
King v. AT&T Corp No. 2:25-cv-02270Washingtona warning or admonition, dismissal, a self-represented party, Rule 11CourtListener
LeDoux v. Outliers Inc No. 3:24-cv-05808WashingtonChatGPT, Claude, dismissal, Rule 11CourtListener
El Bitar v. Wamsley No. 2:26-cv-00919WashingtonGemini / Bard, Rule 11, sanctions, an order to show causeCourtListener
Button v. Jimison No. 3:25-cv-05622Washingtona warning or admonition, dismissal, attorney's fees or costs, a self-represented partyCourtListener
Nelson v. Washington Board of Industrial No. 3:25-cv-05551Washingtona warning or admonition, Rule 11, sanctionsCourtListener

More from Washington, or the whole record of court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations. For the rule this court applies to a filing with AI in it, see the court AI orders tracker.

Show me on one of my files →

Every decision here is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on my files