ApodictaShow me on my files

Michigan · federal district court · 2026

Daghra v. Hinkley

District Court, W.D. Michigan, 16 July 2026. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from the document on file.

Case record · W.D. Mich.

  1. Court. District Court, W.D. MichiganCOURT
  2. Level. federal district courtLEVEL
  3. Date. 16 July 2026DATED
  4. Docket. No. 1:26-cv-01429DOCKET
  5. Judge. Hala Yalda JarbouJUDGE
  6. Documents. one document, 2 passages quoted belowON FILE
  7. Source. CourtListenerSOURCE

Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.

What the court wrote

The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.

Docket entry 11, 16 July 2026 · source · PDF · 3 pages

Docket text. ORDER dismissing habeas petition without prejudice; notice regarding Respondents' use of fictitious citations; signed by Chief Judge Hala Y. Jarbou (mcp) (Entered: 07/16/2026)

Thus, it seems this citation was likely produced by generative artificial intelligence (“AI”). “It is no secret that generative AI programs are known to ‘hallucinate’ nonexistent cases, and with the advent of AI, courts have seen a rash of cases in which both counsel and pro se litigants have cited such fake, hallucinated cases in their briefs.” Lothamer Tax Resol., Inc. v. Kimmel, No.

May 21, 2025) ). “Without question, it is improper and unacceptable for litigants . . . to submit non-existent judicial opinions with fake quotes and citations.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Anonymous v.

What the text mentions

Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.

Where this fits

This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.

More from District Court, W.D. Michigan, from Michigan, or from 2026. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.

Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.

Show me on one of my files →

This case is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked against the record before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on one of my filesTry the gate
Show me on my files