Texas · state appellate court · 2025
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio), 23 July 2025. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from the document on file.
Case record · Tex. App.-San Antonio
Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.
The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.
App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.) —We have used the style, citation, and a purported quotation identified in AGiza’s response to search reliable legal databases for this case. None of those searches located this case, which appears to be fictitious. 1 • In re D.S., 555 S.W.3d 301 (Tex.
None of those searches located this case, which appears to be fictitious. • In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340 (Tex.
Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.
This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.
More from Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio), from Texas, or from 2025. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.
Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.