Iowa · state appellate court · 2026
Court of Appeals of Iowa, 21 October 2026. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from the document on file.
Case record · Iowa Ct. App.
Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.
The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.
See 369 N.W .2d at 822–25. Finally, Cruz cites two cases to support general statements regarding our standard of review, one of which appears to be hallucinated or otherwise incorrect. “We again stress that self-represented litigants and attorneys alike have a duty to independently verify the authenticity and veracity of all sources and assertations when preparing appellate court filings.” Goma v.
Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.
This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.
More from Court of Appeals of Iowa, from Iowa, or from 2026. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.
Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.