Georgia · federal district court · 2025

Nichols v. Walmart Inc.

District Court, S.D. Georgia, 18 March 2025. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from the document on file.

Case record · S.D. Ga.

  1. Court. District Court, S.D. GeorgiaCOURT
  2. Level. federal district courtLEVEL
  3. Date. 18 March 2025DATED
  4. Docket. No. 1:24-cv-00236DOCKET
  5. Judge. James Randal HallJUDGE
  6. Documents. one document, 3 passages quoted belowON FILE
  7. Source. CourtListenerSOURCE

Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.

What the court wrote

The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.

Docket entry 52, 18 March 2025 · source · PDF · 3 pages

Docket text. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to why Rule 11 sanctions should not be imposed for Plaintiff's use of fake case citations in her motion to disqualify opposing counsel. (Doc. 38 .) Show Cause Response due by 4/1/2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 3/18/2025. (amd) (Entered: 03/18/2025)

(Doc. no. 38.) Upon initial review of this filing, the Court observe s Plaintiff relied on several cases that, after extensive research conducted by the undersigned, appear nonexistent . Specifically, the Court is unable to locate any case matching the citation information provided for the following four cases as they are cited in Plaintiff’s motion: 3.

38, pp. 4- 5.) The Court is concerned this nonexistent caselaw, if not blatantly fabricated by Plaintiff on her own, “may be the result of Plaintiff’s usage of artificial - intelligence-hallucinated legal authority.” Greenflight Venture Corp. v. Google LLC , No.

3d 443, 461 (S.D.N.Y. 2023) .2 This Court will not hesitate to impose Rule 11 sanctions against a party who abuses the adversary process or otherwise attempts to deceive the Court by relying on nonexistent caselaw. See Thomas v.

What the text mentions

Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.

Where this fits

This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.

More from District Court, S.D. Georgia, from Georgia, or from 2025. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.

Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.

Show me on one of my files →

This case is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked against the record before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on my files