New York · federal district court · 2025

Peak v. Maraj-Petty

District Court, S.D. New York, 26 November 2025. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from the document on file.

Case record · S.D.N.Y.

  1. Court. District Court, S.D. New YorkCOURT
  2. Level. federal district courtLEVEL
  3. Date. 26 November 2025DATED
  4. Docket. No. 1:25-cv-07552DOCKET
  5. Judge. Vernon Speede BroderickJUDGE
  6. Documents. one document, 2 passages quoted belowON FILE
  7. Source. CourtListenerSOURCE

Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.

What the court wrote

The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.

Docket entry 33, 26 November 2025 · source · PDF · 5 pages

Docket text. ORDER: For these reasons, the 45-day stay in this case will continue, as ordered in my previous Opinion, and Plaintiff is cautioned to conform to Rule 4(J) of my Individual Rules if using generative AI to conduct legal research during the course of this litigation. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 11/26/2025) (rro)

(Doc. 29 at 1.) However, I could not find this quote in Action S.A.; it simply does not exist. Moreover, the circumstances here are markedly different from Action S.A..

July 9, 2025). Here, each of Plaintiff’s case quotations in his second opposition letter, filed on November 12, 2025, cannot be found in the cited cases, suggesting that these quotations might be “hallucinated,” a term used for citations produced by AI “that conform to the Bluebook, but ultimately are not real.” Benjamin v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 779 F.

What the text mentions

Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.

Where this fits

This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.

More from District Court, S.D. New York, from New York, or from 2025. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.

Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.

Show me on one of my files →

This case is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked against the record before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on my files