Florida · federal district court · 2025
District Court, M.D. Florida, 7 November 2025. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from the document on file.
Case record · M.D. Fla.
Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.
The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.
Docket text. Order
Savy’s response in light of his filing of a motion to compel (Doc. 395) replete with unsupported attributions and citations to nonexistent authority. Nearly every cite his twelve- page filing was incomplete, inaccurate, or made up.
2017). Courts have found bad faith when attorneys submit AI-generated fictitious citations in filings. E.g., Versant Funding LLC v.
Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.
This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.
More from District Court, M.D. Florida, from Florida, or from 2025. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.
Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.