Docket entry 69, 13 May 2025 · source · PDF · 2 pages
Docket text. MOTION to Withdraw Document 65 MOTION to Allow Rule 12 Motions MOTION to Dismiss Indictment Failure to Allege Implied Element of Deceived or Cheated MOTION to Dismiss Failure to Allege Implied Element of Use of Access Device was Crux of Offense MOTION to Exclude Evidence Victim Financial Impact Evidence MOTION to Exclude Personal Intimate Conduct under Andrew v. White, 145 S. Ct. 75 (2025) MOTION to Exclude 404(b) Evidence MOTION to Exclude the Online Pet Store MOTION to Prohibit : Insufficiency of Limiting Instructions re: change wrong case citation by Chaima Chabaani. (Zugman, David) (rxc). (Entered: 05/13/2025)
2011) (indictment must provide sufficient detail to ensure fair notice and protect against double jeopardy)”). The principle to which Counsel cited is old and undisputed and Counsel has no idea how that case name got hallucinated into the brief. Counsel does use Artificial Intelligence including LEXIS AI, ChatGPT, and Grok.
The principle Counsel was reciting is uncontroversial. Counsel was operating under extreme time pressure due to Counsel’s current caseload.1 Counsel did not follow his ordinary practice of putting all the cites back into LEXIS to check for hallucinations. Counsel apologizes for this mistake and will not repeat it.