Pennsylvania · federal district court · 2025
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, 19 February 2025. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from the document on file.
Case record · E.D. Pa.
Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.
The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.
Docket text. RESPONSE in Support re 139 MOTION for Attorney Fees Against Raja G. Rajan, Esq. filed by MARK L. BUNCE. (HOMANS, MICHAEL) (Entered: 02/19/2025)
Jan. 17, 2025) (sanctioning attorney with a monetary fine for submitting fictitious cases and quotations to the court and notifying the bars that the attorney was a member); M ata v. A vianca, Inc., C ase No.
Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.
This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.
More from District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, from Pennsylvania, or from 2025. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.
Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.