Pennsylvania · 3 courts
AI-hallucinated citation decisions in Pennsylvania
16 decisions and docket orders, 2024 to 2026, from 3 courts in Pennsylvania, in which a court addressed authority that did not exist. Each links the court's own words and the source document.
Retrieved from CourtListener public records.
Courts in Pennsylvania
Every record, newest first
| Date | Case | Court | The text mentions | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaspryak v. Stadarskyy No. 2781 EDA 2025 | Pa. Super. Ct. | dismissal, a self-represented party | CourtListener | |
| WHITFIELD v. PRIME AGENCY No. 2:26-cv-00327 | E.D. Pa. | continuing legal education, attorney's fees or costs, a self-represented party, Rule 11 | CourtListener | |
| Florian v. O'Neill No. 1:25-cv-02253 | M.D. Penn. | ChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented party | CourtListener | |
| LIFETIME WELL LLC v. IBSPOT.COM INC. No. 2:25-cv-05135 | E.D. Pa. | ChatGPT, Lexis+ AI, a referral to a bar or disciplinary body, continuing legal education | CourtListener | |
| Saber v. Navy Federal Credit Union No. 2449 EDA 2024 | Pa. Super. Ct. | dismissal, a self-represented party | CourtListener | |
| Allbaugh v. University of Scranton No. 3:24-cv-02237 | M.D. Penn. | ChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, dismissal | CourtListener | |
| Nora v. M & A Transport No. 5:25-cv-04698 | E.D. Pa. | Westlaw AI, a referral to a bar or disciplinary body, continuing legal education, dismissal | CourtListener | |
| BUNCE v. VISUAL TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS No. 2:23-cv-01740 | E.D. Pa. | Rule 11, sanctions, an order to show cause | CourtListener | |
| Tanibajeva v. Skytop Lodge Corporation No. 3:23-cv-01846 | M.D. Penn. | ChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented party | CourtListener | |
| Javitz v. Watchilla No. 3:23-cv-01135 | M.D. Penn. | ChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented party | CourtListener | |
| Plotkin v. The Procter & Gamble No. 3:22-cv-00579 | M.D. Penn. | ChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented party | CourtListener | |
| Shnipes v. Shapiro No. 3:22-cv-00196 | M.D. Penn. | ChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented party | CourtListener | |
| Settlers Hospitality Group v. Zurich American Insurance Company No. 3:22-cv-00966 | M.D. Penn. | ChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented party | CourtListener | |
| Burlone v. Wal-Mart Stores No. 3:24-cv-00495 | M.D. Penn. | ChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented party | CourtListener | |
| Kinner v. Portfolio Recovery Associates No. 4:22-cv-01948 | M.D. Penn. | ChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented party | CourtListener | |
| United States v. Jackson No. 1:24-cr-00183 | M.D. Penn. | ChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented party | CourtListener |
The whole record of court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations. For what courts and bars in Pennsylvania require of a filing with AI in it, see the court AI orders tracker.