District of Columbia · federal district court
AI-hallucinated citation decisions: District Court, District of Columbia
5 decisions and docket orders from this court, 2024 to 2026, in which the court addressed authority that did not exist. 5 carry a page with the court's words quoted; the rest link straight to the source.
Retrieved from CourtListener public records.
| Date | Case | State | The text mentions | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARKI REVEND v. TREEFA AZIZ No. 1:24-cv-00278 | District of Columbia | Rule 11, sanctions | CourtListener | |
| Jones v. District of Columbia Office No. Civil Action No. 2025-1129 | District of Columbia | a referral to a bar or disciplinary body, dismissal, Rule 11, sanctions | CourtListener | |
| N-Bar Trade Inc. v. amazon.com Services LLC No. Civil Action No. 2025-0918 | District of Columbia | dismissal, Rule 11, sanctions, an order to show cause | CourtListener | |
| Williams v. Capital One Bank No. Civil Action No. 2024-2032 | District of Columbia | ChatGPT, CoCounsel, a warning or admonition, dismissal | CourtListener | |
| Rubio v. District of Columbia Department No. Civil Action No. 2023-0719 | District of Columbia | dismissal, a self-represented party, Rule 11, sanctions | CourtListener |
More from District of Columbia, or the whole record of court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations. For the rule this court applies to a filing with AI in it, see the court AI orders tracker.