District of Columbia · 2 courts
AI-hallucinated citation decisions in District of Columbia
6 decisions and docket orders, 2024 to 2026, from 2 courts in District of Columbia, in which a court addressed authority that did not exist. Each links the court's own words and the source document.
Retrieved from CourtListener public records.
Courts in District of Columbia
Every record, newest first
| Date | Case | Court | The text mentions | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust No. 24-CV-1099 | D.C. | ChatGPT, a warning or admonition, a referral to a bar or disciplinary body, dismissal | CourtListener | |
| MARKI REVEND v. TREEFA AZIZ No. 1:24-cv-00278 | D.D.C. | Rule 11, sanctions | CourtListener | |
| Jones v. District of Columbia Office No. Civil Action No. 2025-1129 | D.D.C. | a referral to a bar or disciplinary body, dismissal, Rule 11, sanctions | CourtListener | |
| N-Bar Trade Inc. v. amazon.com Services LLC No. Civil Action No. 2025-0918 | D.D.C. | dismissal, Rule 11, sanctions, an order to show cause | CourtListener | |
| Williams v. Capital One Bank No. Civil Action No. 2024-2032 | D.D.C. | ChatGPT, CoCounsel, a warning or admonition, dismissal | CourtListener | |
| Rubio v. District of Columbia Department No. Civil Action No. 2023-0719 | D.D.C. | dismissal, a self-represented party, Rule 11, sanctions | CourtListener |
The whole record of court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations. For what courts and bars in District of Columbia require of a filing with AI in it, see the court AI orders tracker.