ApodictaShow me on my files

Utah · federal district court · 2026

Greer v. Moon

District Court, D. Utah, 12 January 2026. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from 3 documents on file.

Case record · D. Utah

  1. Court. District Court, D. UtahCOURT
  2. Level. federal district courtLEVEL
  3. Date. 12 January 2026DATED
  4. Docket. No. 2:24-cv-00421DOCKET
  5. Judge. David BarlowJUDGE
  6. Documents. 3 documents, 5 passages quoted belowON FILE
  7. Source. CourtListenerSOURCE

Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.

What the court wrote

The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.

Docket entry 439, 12 January 2026 · source · PDF · 2 pages

Docket text. ERRATA to 438 Notice (Other), filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, adding missing exhibit. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit D (Defendants first notify Mr. Greer of hallucinated citations))(Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 01/12/2026)

Numerous courts have imposed sanctions for using artificial intelligence. AI is known to “hallucinate” cases or provide improper citations, often purporting that cases stand for propositions they do not. Wadsworth v.

Docket entry 438, 12 January 2026 · source · PDF · 3 pages

Docket text. NOTICE of Hallucinated Citations by Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon re 437 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (what is actually found at 179 F. App'x 575), # 2 Exhibit B (D.Kan. docket for Case 2:22-cv-2060), # 3 Exhibit C (correspondence with Mr. Greer in which he provides an entirely different O'Bannon case, and provides no explanation at all for the hallucination of Schulte)) (Hardin, Matthew) (Entered: 01/12/2026)

Matthew D. Hardin (pro hac vice) HARDIN LAW OFFICE 101 Rainbow Drive # 11506 Livingston, TX 77399 Telephone: (202) 802-1948 Email: [email protected] Attorney for Defendants THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH RUSSELL GREER, DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF HALLUCINATED CITATIONS Plaintiff, v. Case No.

Bennett Defendant. NOW COME the Defendants, by and through undersigned counsel, and submit this Notice of Hallucinated Citations in Mr. Greer’s filing at ECF No.

431. Second, the Schulte case does not exist. No wonder, then, that Defendants did not rely on it.

Defendants notified Mr. Greer of his hallucinated citations above. Exhibit C.

What the text mentions

Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.

Where this fits

This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.

More from District Court, D. Utah, from Utah, or from 2026. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.

Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.

Show me on one of my files →

This case is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked against the record before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on one of my filesTry the gate
Show me on my files