Utah · 2 courts
AI-hallucinated citation decisions in Utah
5 decisions and docket orders, 2025 to 2026, from 2 courts in Utah, in which a court addressed authority that did not exist. Each links the court's own words and the source document.
Retrieved from CourtListener public records.
Courts in Utah
Every record, newest first
| Date | Case | Court | The text mentions | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hack v. Preston No. 4:25-cv-00096 | D. Utah | ChatGPT, dismissal, a self-represented party, Rule 11 | CourtListener | |
| Wilkes v. Canyons School District No. 2:25-cv-00218 | D. Utah | a warning or admonition, continuing legal education, dismissal, sanctions | CourtListener | |
| Greer v. Moon No. 2:24-cv-00421 | D. Utah | a self-represented party, Rule 11, sanctions | CourtListener | |
| Black Oak Capital BOCA v. Paul Evans No. 2:24-cv-00209 | D. Utah | dismissal, Rule 11, sanctions, striking a filing | CourtListener | |
| Garner v. Kadince No. Case No. 20250188-CA | Utah Ct. App. | ChatGPT, Rule 11, sanctions, an order to show cause | CourtListener |
The whole record of court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations. For what courts and bars in Utah require of a filing with AI in it, see the court AI orders tracker.