2024 · 14 courts

AI-hallucinated citation decisions in 2024

22 decisions and docket orders in 2024, from 14 courts, in which a court addressed authority that did not exist. Each links the court's own words and the source document.

Retrieved from CourtListener public records.

Where the decisions came from

Every record, newest first

2024 · 22 records
DateCaseCourtStateThe text mentionsSource
Al-Hamim v. Star Hearthstone No. 24CA0190Colo. Ct. App.ColoradoChatGPT, a warning or admonition, dismissal, a self-represented partyCourtListener
Carlos E. Gutierrez v. in Re: Noemi D. No. 3D2024-1014Fla. Dist. Ct. App.FloridaChatGPT, dismissal, a self-represented party, Rule 11CourtListener
Rubio v. District of Columbia Department No. Civil Action No. 2023-0719D.D.C.District of Columbiadismissal, a self-represented party, Rule 11, sanctionsCourtListener
Kohls v. Ellison No. 0:24-cv-03754D. MinnesotaMinnesotaChatGPT, Google (search or AI overview), a warning or admonitionCourtListener
Gauthier v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber No. 1:23-cv-00281E.D. Tex.TexasChatGPT, Claude, Gemini / Bard, Lexis+ AICourtListener
Khlafa v. Oregon Health No. 3:23-cv-01013D. Or.OregonChatGPT, dismissal, attorney's fees or costs, a self-represented partyCourtListener
Royce Jones v. Simploy No. ED112394Mo. Ct. App.Missouria warning or admonition, a certification about AI use, dismissal, a self-represented partyCourtListener
Sam v. Mobile No. 3:23-cv-50301N.D. Ill.IllinoisChatGPT, a warning or admonition, dismissal, a self-represented partyCourtListener
Tanibajeva v. Skytop Lodge Corporation No. 3:23-cv-01846M.D. Penn.PennsylvaniaChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented partyCourtListener
Javitz v. Watchilla No. 3:23-cv-01135M.D. Penn.PennsylvaniaChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented partyCourtListener
Plotkin v. The Procter & Gamble No. 3:22-cv-00579M.D. Penn.PennsylvaniaChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented partyCourtListener
Shnipes v. Shapiro No. 3:22-cv-00196M.D. Penn.PennsylvaniaChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented partyCourtListener
Settlers Hospitality Group v. Zurich American Insurance Company No. 3:22-cv-00966M.D. Penn.PennsylvaniaChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented partyCourtListener
Burlone v. Wal-Mart Stores No. 3:24-cv-00495M.D. Penn.PennsylvaniaChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented partyCourtListener
Kinner v. Portfolio Recovery Associates No. 4:22-cv-01948M.D. Penn.PennsylvaniaChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented partyCourtListener
Iovino v. Michael Stapleton Associates No. 5:21-cv-00064W.D. Va.VirginiaChatGPT, Claude, CoCounsel, CopilotCourtListener
United States v. Jackson No. 1:24-cr-00183M.D. Penn.PennsylvaniaChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a certification about AI use, a self-represented partyCourtListener
James Snell v. United Specialty Insurance Company No. 22-1258111th Cir.FederalChatGPT, Claude, Gemini / Bard, a warning or admonitionCourtListener
United States v. Cohen No. 1:18-cr-00602S.D.N.Y.New YorkGemini / Bard, Rule 11, sanctions, an order to show causeCourtListener
Molly Kruse v. Jonathan R. Karlen No. ED111172Mo. Ct. App.MissouridismissalCourtListener
Park v. Kim No. 22-20572d Cir.FederalChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a warning or admonition, a referral to a bar or disciplinary bodyCourtListener
Park v. Kim No. 1:20-cv-02636E.D.N.YNew YorkChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, a warning or admonition, a referral to a bar or disciplinary bodyCourtListener

Every year in the record, the whole record of court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations, or the sanctions record, the essay this table grew out of.

Show me on one of my files →

Every decision here is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on my files